<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
	
	<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:forum-4361976</id>
	<title>Nabble - LibreCAD-dev</title>
	<updated>2026-04-03T13:32:12Z</updated>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://librecad.169.s1.nabble.com/LibreCAD-dev-f4361976.xml" />
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-dev-f4361976.html" />
	<subtitle type="html">&lt;b&gt;CONTENTS DELETED&lt;/b&gt;
			&lt;div class=&quot;weak-color&quot;&gt;The author has deleted this message.&lt;/div&gt;</subtitle>
	
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729157</id>
		<title>Re: how do I install the lattest version LibreCAD</title>
		<published>2026-04-03T13:06:40Z</published>
		<updated>2026-04-03T13:06:40Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			In Linux or mac, you can always build from source. Just ask AI to generate a script to do so.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;AppImage, snap, flatpak are available also.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For AppImage and Snap,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1-latest&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1-latest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;JWtH wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message shrinkable-quote&quot;&gt;I've download the file: LibreCAD-v2.2.1.3-12-gd1ca469c9.snap
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My ubuntu version is Ubuntu 25.04
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the snap command work not.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What to do?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spidey JWTH
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/how-do-I-install-the-lattest-version-LibreCAD-tp5729155p5729157.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729155"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729155</id>
		<title>how do I install the lattest version LibreCAD</title>
		<published>2026-04-03T12:34:44Z</published>
		<updated>2026-04-03T12:34:44Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>JWtH</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I've download the file: LibreCAD-v2.2.1.3-12-gd1ca469c9.snap
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My ubuntu version is Ubuntu 25.04
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But the snap command work not.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What to do?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Spidey JWTH

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/how-do-I-install-the-lattest-version-LibreCAD-tp5729155.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729089</id>
		<title>Re: v2.2.1.4 released</title>
		<published>2026-03-28T14:12:13Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-28T14:12:13Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			for 64-bit windows, *-win64-msvc.exe &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Installer for 64-bit Windows
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We may want to update the README.md to provide specific installation guide.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;fgd3 wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message shrinkable-quote&quot;&gt;OK. &amp;nbsp;Thanks for clearing that up for me.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am also a little unclear with regard to which file does what. &amp;nbsp;Could you fill in the missing descriptions and correct any that are wrong?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;latest.tar.gz &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;? in tar format
&lt;br/&gt;latest.zip &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;? in zip archive
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-aarch64.AppImage &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-arm64.dmg &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-msvc.exe &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Installer for 32-bit Windows
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-win64-msvc.exe &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Installer for 64-bit Windows
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-x86_64.AppImage &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Executable files for Linux running on Intel x86 chips
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9.dmg &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9.snap &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;License &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Text file of license terms
&lt;br/&gt;Source code (zip) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Source code in zip archive
&lt;br/&gt;Source code (tar.gz) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Source code in tar format
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are these descriptions documented anywhere?
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/v2-2-1-4-released-tp5728901p5729089.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729088"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729088</id>
		<title>Re: v2.2.1.4 released</title>
		<published>2026-03-28T13:51:58Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-28T13:51:58Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>fgd3</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			OK. &amp;nbsp;Thanks for clearing that up for me.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am also a little unclear with regard to which file does what. &amp;nbsp;Could you fill in the missing descriptions and correct any that are wrong?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;latest.tar.gz &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;? in tar format
&lt;br/&gt;latest.zip &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;? in zip archive
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-aarch64.AppImage &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-arm64.dmg &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-msvc.exe &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Installer for 32-bit Windows
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-win64-msvc.exe &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Installer for 64-bit Windows
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9-x86_64.AppImage &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Executable files for Linux running on Intel x86 chips
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9.dmg &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;gd1ca469c9.snap &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ?
&lt;br/&gt;License &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Text file of license terms
&lt;br/&gt;Source code (zip) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Source code in zip archive
&lt;br/&gt;Source code (tar.gz) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Source code in tar format
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are these descriptions documented anywhere?
&lt;br/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/v2-2-1-4-released-tp5728901p5729088.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729083"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729083</id>
		<title>Re: v2.2.1.4 released</title>
		<published>2026-03-27T22:12:38Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-27T22:12:38Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			@fgd3
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sorry for the confusion, 2.2.1.3-12 should have been &amp;nbsp;renamed to 2.2.1.4, so 2.2.1.3-12 the actually the correct ones
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;fgd3 wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message&quot;&gt;So how can I download v2.2.1.4? &amp;nbsp;From &lt;a href=&quot;https://librecad.org/#download&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://librecad.org/#download&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I follow the &amp;quot;from GitHub&amp;quot; link (&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;nbsp;v2.2.1.4 (&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&lt;/a&gt;) shows me a list of assets
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5729075/Assets.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Everything is for v2.2.1.3-12. &amp;nbsp;I don't find any links to download a 64-bit Windows installer for v2.2.1.4.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/v2-2-1-4-released-tp5728901p5729083.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729075"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729075</id>
		<title>Re: v2.2.1.4 released</title>
		<published>2026-03-27T07:27:46Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-27T07:27:46Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>fgd3</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			So how can I download v2.2.1.4? &amp;nbsp;From &lt;a href=&quot;https://librecad.org/#download&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://librecad.org/#download&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I follow the &amp;quot;from GitHub&amp;quot; link (&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;nbsp;v2.2.1.4 (&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&lt;/a&gt;) shows me a list of assets
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5729075/Assets.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Everything is for v2.2.1.3-12. &amp;nbsp;I don't find any links to download a 64-bit Windows installer for v2.2.1.4.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/v2-2-1-4-released-tp5728901p5729075.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728901"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729035</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-03-22T14:31:59Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-22T14:31:59Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hi usuario,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes, I am aware of this one.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We pushed the annotated tag and the commit in one push command, and rely on the ‘git describe’ command to find the release name
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Looks like we may need something more explicit in the current hit describe command.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for bringing this up.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The next 2.2.1.5 will also focus on multilingual support. Updating the translations has been overdue for a while.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;usuario wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message shrinkable-quote&quot;&gt;Hi,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I wanted to point out a possible confusion regarding the versions.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The release announcement mentions 2.2.1.4:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, the downloadable files show 2.2.1.3-12.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not knowing which version is being used or downloaded might make some users hesitant to install it, which could lead to lower feedback on functionality or bugs.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for your amazing contribution to LibreCAD!
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Best regards,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Usuario
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5729035.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729034"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729034</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-03-22T14:20:12Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-22T14:20:12Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>usuario</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hi,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I wanted to point out a possible confusion regarding the versions.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The release announcement mentions 2.2.1.4:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, the downloadable files show 2.2.1.3-12.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not knowing which version is being used or downloaded might make some users hesitant to install it, which could lead to lower feedback on functionality or bugs.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for your amazing contribution to LibreCAD!
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Best regards,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Usuario

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5729034.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728787"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5729013</id>
		<title>Re: Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-19T05:14:06Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-19T05:14:06Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>GerardZ</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			My problem is solved at this moment 

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979p5729013.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728979"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728987</id>
		<title>Re: Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-13T18:03:13Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-13T18:03:13Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I suppose you are running Apple Silicon (m5, etc.). Please try the fix mentioned in:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/issues/2162&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/issues/2162&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
xattr -rc LibreCAD.app
sudo codesign --force --deep --sign - LibreCAD.app
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;GerardZ wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message&quot;&gt;I am sorry, but this method is not the solution to my problem.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979p5728987.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728982"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728983</id>
		<title>Re: Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-13T13:39:20Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-13T13:39:20Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>flywire</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			From AI on my phone:
&lt;br/&gt;The &amp;quot;unverified developer&amp;quot; warning is normal for LibreCAD because it's an open-source project and not signed by Apple. &amp;nbsp;The software is safe and can be installed by bypassing macOS Gatekeeper. Here's how:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How to Fix the &amp;quot;Unverified Developer&amp;quot; Error
&lt;br/&gt;Try to open LibreCAD from your Applications folder — it will fail and show the warning. 
&lt;br/&gt;Go to System Settings &amp;gt; Privacy &amp; Security. 
&lt;br/&gt;Scroll down and look for a message like:
&lt;br/&gt;&amp;quot;LibreCAD was blocked from opening because it is not from an identified developer.&amp;quot;
&lt;br/&gt;Click Open Anyway.
&lt;br/&gt;Return to Applications and try opening LibreCAD again — this time, click Open in the confirmation dialog. 
&lt;br/&gt;This is a one-time process. After approval, LibreCAD will launch normally. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;🔐 Note: LibreCAD is safe. The warning appears because Apple requires paid developer certificates to sign apps — many open-source projects, including LibreCAD, don't pay for this. 

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979p5728983.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728982"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728982</id>
		<title>Re: Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-13T12:38:34Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-13T12:38:34Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>GerardZ</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I am sorry, but this method is not the solution to my problem.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979p5728982.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728980"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728980</id>
		<title>Re: Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-13T12:05:34Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-13T12:05:34Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>perepujal</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Maybe this could help?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/MacOS-installation-td5719861.html&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://forum.librecad.org/MacOS-installation-td5719861.html&lt;/a&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979p5728980.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728979"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728979</id>
		<title>Verify LibreCAD file on MacBook</title>
		<published>2026-03-13T11:42:59Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-13T11:42:59Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>GerardZ</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I want to install the free Librecad software on my Macbook Air. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I found the download link on GitHub via Librecad.org. I then downloaded a .dmg file. When extracting/installing, I keep getting the message that the source cannot be verified. Can someone tell me how to solve this or perhaps recommend another source that can be verified?

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Verify-LibreCAD-file-on-MacBook-tp5728979.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728901</id>
		<title>v2.2.1.4 released</title>
		<published>2026-03-03T10:32:08Z</published>
		<updated>2026-03-03T10:32:08Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			For the next 2.2.1.5 release, language support should also be within our focus, in addition to the expected stability fixes.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/v2-2-1-4-released-tp5728901.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728866</id>
		<title>Time for 2.2.1.4, any blockers?</title>
		<published>2026-02-25T15:13:20Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-25T15:13:20Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			If you have any blockers for 2.2.1.4, please feel free to discuss here.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As a bugfix release, 2.2.1.4 should come with improvements on stability and packaging.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Time-for-2-2-1-4-any-blockers-tp5728866.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728811</id>
		<title>Re: Request to review and merge updates from codelibs/libdxfrw into LibreCAD/libdxfrw</title>
		<published>2026-02-17T13:45:49Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-17T13:45:49Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>sand1024</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			well, that's a good point. Actually, libdxfrw within LibreCAD is also updated as part of generic development, yet probably something useful may be be in added in that fork too. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, from the very first glance - changes there are quite minor and similar code is present in LC version of the library. Yet it will requrie deeper investigation &amp;nbsp;- so thank you for reporting anyway.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Request-to-review-and-merge-updates-from-codelibs-libdxfrw-into-LibreCAD-libdxfrw-tp5728810p5728811.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728810"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728810</id>
		<title>Request to review and merge updates from codelibs/libdxfrw into LibreCAD/libdxfrw</title>
		<published>2026-02-17T13:18:53Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-17T13:18:53Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>usuario</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hi everyone,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I've been following the development of the libdxfrw library and noticed that the fork maintained by codelibs has several commits and improvements that aren't yet present in the official LibreCAD/libdxfrw repository.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Given the importance of DXF/DWG support for LibreCAD, would it be possible for a maintainer to review the work done here?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Source of updates: &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/codelibs/libdxfrw&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/codelibs/libdxfrw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Contributor activity: &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/codelibs/libdxfrw/graphs/contributors&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/codelibs/libdxfrw/graphs/contributors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It would be great if these improvements could be merged into the main LibreCAD/libdxfrw branch to keep the library up to date:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Target: &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/libdxfrw&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/libdxfrw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for all your hard work on this project!

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Request-to-review-and-merge-updates-from-codelibs-libdxfrw-into-LibreCAD-libdxfrw-tp5728810.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728787</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-02-16T03:30:31Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-16T03:30:31Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Yes, that's confusing.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I just did a simple fix: latest builds for the 2.2.1 branch are now under the tag: 2.2.1-latest:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1-latest&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1-latest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;and the 2.2.2/master branch will be tagged as 2.2.2_alpha-latest:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.2_alpha-latest&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.2_alpha-latest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There may still be some fixes needed for the tags generated by &amp;quot;git describe&amp;quot;
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;usuario wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message shrinkable-quote&quot;&gt;Hello,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have a question regarding the naming scheme and chronology of the latest LibreCAD versions.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I noticed that version v2.2.1.2 (Released/Final) was released on July 13, 2025, while version 2.2.1.1_rc-latest (Release Candidate) was released later, on October 15, 2025.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My question is: Are these dates and version names correct? In standard versioning, a version released later in time (October 2025) should have a higher number. Shouldn't this release candidate be 2.2.1.3 instead of a test version from the 2.2.1.1 branch?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thank you in advance for the clarification.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728375/LibreCAD_versions.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728787.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728375"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728786</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-02-16T03:23:59Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-16T03:23:59Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			That's true. The 2.2.1 was an attempt to reach a stable release, after some wild late merging of new features. Even with 2.2.1.3 (roughly one year after 2.2.1's initial release), we still got some embarrassing issues persist (like icon, win32 displayed version, etc., I just fixed).
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2.2.2 was getting even wilder. So wild to justify a 2.3 branch. I'm open to that approach: 1. rename 2.2.2 to 2.3.0-alpha; 2. continue to stablize the branch, while still open to new features.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For 2.2.1 branch, please also help bug fixing, so we could provide a truly stable 2D CAD for the community.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;silasb wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message&quot;&gt;I'm also curious on a roadmap and potential release.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Coming from a software development background, the versioning is confusing. &amp;nbsp;I'd expect the newest version to follow Semver. &amp;nbsp;I understand that version 3 is suppose to be an entire rewrite, but I feel like there is enough breaking changes within 2.2.2 that it might be better to use version 3 for the next release, or at least version it as 2.3.x.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728786.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728686"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728783</id>
		<title>Re: Any Linux LibreCAD appimage</title>
		<published>2026-02-15T08:02:47Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-15T08:19:02Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Alexandre Parente</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			This AppImage runs flawlessly on Ubuntu 25.10. All printers are available, unlike in the official version.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Any-Linux-LibreCAD-appimage-tp5728616p5728783.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728616"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728686</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-02-03T08:25:20Z</published>
		<updated>2026-02-03T08:25:20Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>silasb</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I'm also curious on a roadmap and potential release.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Coming from a software development background, the versioning is confusing. &amp;nbsp;I'd expect the newest version to follow Semver. &amp;nbsp;I understand that version 3 is suppose to be an entire rewrite, but I feel like there is enough breaking changes within 2.2.2 that it might be better to use version 3 for the next release, or at least version it as 2.3.x. 

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728686.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728614"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728616</id>
		<title>Any Linux LibreCAD appimage</title>
		<published>2026-01-23T17:48:21Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-23T17:48:21Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dellus</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I have stumbled upon this via the puppylinux forum. It is different to LibreCAD's own appimage in that it works with a wide variety of linuxes, also older ones. For me it works even with puppy Buster and Xenial. It is a bit larger though.
&lt;br/&gt;I'm not sure what is the right place to post, but if it is of interest for someone:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/pkgforge-dev/LibreCAD-AppImage/releases/download/2.2.1.3-2%402026-01-22_1769070645/LibreCAD-2.2.1.3-2-anylinux-x86_64.AppImage&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/pkgforge-dev/LibreCAD-AppImage/releases/download/2.2.1.3-2%402026-01-22_1769070645/LibreCAD-2.2.1.3-2-anylinux-x86_64.AppImage&lt;/a&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Any-Linux-LibreCAD-appimage-tp5728616.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728614</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-01-23T15:28:33Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-23T15:28:33Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dellus</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			I have to support usuario's view on naming. It is as is usual in other projects, I find LibreCAD's way confusing too.

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728614.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728613"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728613</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-01-23T14:34:47Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-23T14:34:47Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>usuario</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hello,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is possible that the original question was not explained clearly, so the following provides a more detailed description.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On January 11, 2026, LibreCAD version 2.2.1.3 was released and tagged as LibreCAD-v2.2.1.3-2 [1].
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Later, on January 23, 2026, version 2.2.1.3_rc-latest was released and tagged as LibreCAD-v2.2.1.3-3 [2].
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is this version tagging scheme correct? Respectfully, it is considered that the current naming and release approach may lead to some confusion.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For instance, when encountering a version labeled 2.2.1.3_rc-latest, it is generally assumed to be a release candidate for an upcoming 2.2.1.3 stable release. However, in the case of LibreCAD, that stable version had already been released earlier.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps the version released on January 23 could have been named 2.2.1.4_rc-latest or 2.2.1.3-3_rc-latest to better reflect its purpose and avoid ambiguity.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Additionally, this is an opportunity to ask whether there is a roadmap or estimated release date for version 2.2.2. This upcoming version has remained in an alpha state for several months, which typically suggests that it may continue to receive new features and functionality before eventually entering a hypothetical beta (stabilization) phase and its corresponding release candidates.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Once again, appreciation is expressed for all the effort invested in making LibreCAD better every day.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Best regards,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.3&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/v2.2.1.3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1.3_rc-latest&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/releases/tag/2.2.1.3_rc-latest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728613.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728485"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728524</id>
		<title>2.2.1.3 Released</title>
		<published>2026-01-11T14:19:15Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-12T10:15:45Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Please help test this bug fixing release.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Added support for macOS Apple Silicon build. Please note the dmg file is not signed, and running is blocked by macOS security. Some workaround is needed in order to run the Apple Silicon (arm64) version of DMG:
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;xattr -rc LibreCAD.app
&lt;br/&gt;sudo codesign --force --deep --sign - LibreCAD.app&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Compared with previous changes, Windows builds are built using MSVC instead of MinGW.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-Released-tp5728524.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728518</id>
		<title>Re: 2.2.1.3 should be released soon.</title>
		<published>2026-01-09T21:25:37Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-09T21:25:37Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>arquisa</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hey friend, since previous versions of LibreCAD I've noticed that when the software units are in inches, the line width appears thick on screen, but when working in meters, the line width isn't visible. Is this normal? Is it possible for the line to appear thick when working in meters?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728518/Captura_de_pantalla_2026-01-09_221250.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728518/Captura_de_pantalla_2026-01-09_221335.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-should-be-released-soon-tp5728486p5728518.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728486"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728517</id>
		<title>Re: 2.2.1.3 should be released soon.</title>
		<published>2026-01-09T09:49:05Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-09T09:49:05Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>arquisa</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Thanks bro, greetings

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-should-be-released-soon-tp5728486p5728517.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728489"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728489</id>
		<title>Re: 2.2.1.3 should be released soon.</title>
		<published>2026-01-09T00:22:12Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-09T00:22:12Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			@arquisa,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for bringing this up. The issue is fixed for Windows installers in 2.2.1, and I will test other builds.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;arquisa wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message&quot;&gt;Hey friend, the hatch list only shows ANSI 31 and the other patterns aren't visible.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728488/Captura_de_pantalla_2026-01-08_122715.png&quot; border=&quot;0 &quot;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-should-be-released-soon-tp5728486p5728489.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728488"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728488</id>
		<title>Re: 2.2.1.3 should be released soon.</title>
		<published>2026-01-08T11:30:01Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-08T11:30:01Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>arquisa</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Hey friend, the hatch list only shows ANSI 31 and the other patterns aren't visible.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728488/Captura_de_pantalla_2026-01-08_122715.png&quot; border=&quot;0 &quot;/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-should-be-released-soon-tp5728486p5728488.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728486"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728486</id>
		<title>2.2.1.3 should be released soon.</title>
		<published>2026-01-08T09:52:21Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-08T09:52:21Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Any suggestion on additional fixes is welcome!

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/2-2-1-3-should-be-released-soon-tp5728486.html" />
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728485</id>
		<title>Re: LibreCAD versions</title>
		<published>2026-01-08T09:51:18Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-08T09:51:18Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			if it was built later, it was also from newer codebase. The version number could be mistaken though.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We are releasing 2.2.1.3 soon (just feel free to download and test from Release Candidates&amp;quot;)
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;usuario wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message shrinkable-quote&quot;&gt;Hello,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have a question regarding the naming scheme and chronology of the latest LibreCAD versions.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I noticed that version v2.2.1.2 (Released/Final) was released on July 13, 2025, while version 2.2.1.1_rc-latest (Release Candidate) was released later, on October 15, 2025.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My question is: Are these dates and version names correct? In standard versioning, a version released later in time (October 2025) should have a higher number. Shouldn't this release candidate be 2.2.1.3 instead of a test version from the 2.2.1.1 branch?
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thank you in advance for the clarification.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728375/LibreCAD_versions.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/LibreCAD-versions-tp5728375p5728485.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728375"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728458</id>
		<title>Re: Happy new year with hyperbola support to complete conics in LC</title>
		<published>2026-01-03T08:00:10Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-05T06:15:51Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			@sand1024,
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I tested with different WCS settings, and no rendering issue is found.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From the code level, lc_hyperbola::draw() calls existing RS_Painter::drawSplinePointsWCS(), so it's using existing WCS support, rendering in graph coordinates.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;quote dark-border-color&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;quote light-border-color&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot; style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;sand1024 wrote&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-message&quot;&gt;@dxli
&lt;br/&gt;Oh, it's a good news. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And just in case - please also check the implementation for the case with active UCS that is rotated - just to ensure correct rendering.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Happy-new-year-with-hyperbola-support-to-complete-conics-in-LC-tp5728451p5728458.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728455"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728455</id>
		<title>Re: Happy new year with hyperbola support to complete conics in LC</title>
		<published>2026-01-03T02:12:33Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-03T02:12:33Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>sand1024</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			@dxli
&lt;br/&gt;Oh, it's a good news. 
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And just in case - please also check the implementation for the case with active UCS that is rotated - just to ensure correct rendering. 

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Happy-new-year-with-hyperbola-support-to-complete-conics-in-LC-tp5728451p5728455.html" />
		<thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728451"/>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>tag:librecad.169.s1.nabble.com,2006:post-5728451</id>
		<title>Happy new year with hyperbola support to complete conics in LC</title>
		<published>2026-01-02T05:01:37Z</published>
		<updated>2026-01-02T13:59:26Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>dxli</name>
		</author>
		<content type="html">
			Happy new year to everyone!
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;While 2025 saw some heavy development in LibreCAD-master, I didn't get enough development time to complete the last piece of conics support in LibreCAD: a new primitive geometry: hyperbola.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The features are getting production ready, and PR merging is expected soon, if no serious issue is found.
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The PR: &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/pull/2402&quot; target=&quot;_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; link=&quot;external&quot;&gt;https://github.com/LibreCAD/LibreCAD/pull/2402&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Any suggestion is welcome!
&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://forum.librecad.org/file/n5728451/hyperbola.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Hyperbola&quot;/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

	
	
	
			
		</content>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://forum.librecad.org/Happy-new-year-with-hyperbola-support-to-complete-conics-in-LC-tp5728451.html" />
		
	</entry>
</feed>